SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON

JEFFERSON, WISCONSIN

 

MINUTES

CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION COMMITTEE

December 12, 2005

 

The Curriculum & Instruction Committee of the Board of Education of the School District of Jefferson met on Monday, December 12, 2005, in the High School Library.  Chairperson Whitmore called the meeting to order at 6:36 p.m. with Committee members Saelens, Neils, and Stoner present. 

 

Approval of 11/14/05 Committee Minutes: Motion by Ms. Neils, seconded by Mr. Stoner to approve the minutes of the November 14, 2005 meeting as presented.  The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.

 

Instruction

Education for Employment Five-Year Plan:  Dennis Linse, district Education for Employment (ERE) Coordinator, reviewed the new ERE plan for 2005-2010.  Rich Herbst and Donna Essock were also in attendance to answer committee concerns. 

 

A motion to approve the Education for Employment 5-Year Plan 2005-2010 as presented and forward for full Board approval was made by Mr. Stoner, seconded by Mrs. Saelens.  The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.

 

Curriculum

JHS Math Department Curriculum Proposal—Second Reading:  The Jefferson High School Mathematics Department presented its proposal to adopt the Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP).

 

Nationally known math teacher and Board member of the Wisconsin Mathematics Council, Corey Andreasen, was in attendance adding diverse first-hand perspectives on the history, goals, and advantages of federally funded NSF/NCTM math programs, and IMP in particular.

 

The extensive discussion on the pros and cons of the program was lively.  Numerous resources were provided for committee review including background materials about the NCTM standards, the TIMMS research comparing the performance of American students in math with counterparts around the world.

 

Some of the discussion points included:

*        The IMP program is best for the most students

*        In traditional programs the top students are not as prepared

*        IMP provides a higher level of vocabulary and the students work together more.  There is a lower frustration level, and students learn better problem-solving skills.

*        In other districts, the math test scores jump almost immediately after implementation of the IMP program.

*        Another option is the “Core Plus” program which has more reading involved.  Both IMP and Core Plus are thematic and activity based.

*        IMP is truly integrated with real world situations.

*        Test scores from districts using IMP were shared.

*        The Special Education teachers are excited about the IMP program because it “makes more sense”

*        Lower level students can have success with the IMP program.

*        The program fits well with Professional Learning Communities.

*        No program is perfect for every student.

*        Parental concerns that they “can’t help their children with math anymore” were addressed. 

*        Society today is different – students need to learn reasoning skills.

 

A motion to approve the 9-12 IMP Math Curriculum as presented and forward for full Board approval was made by Mr. Stoner, seconded by Mrs. Saelens.  The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.

 

A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Neils, seconded by Mr. Stoner.  The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote.

 

ADJOURNMENT: 7:54 p.m.

BOARD OF EDUCATION

Pati Fitzgerald, Board Secretary